Curry's Paradox and ω -Inconsistency

نویسنده

  • Andrew Bacon
چکیده

In recent years there has been a revitalised interest in nonclassical solutions to the semantic paradoxes. In this paper I show that a number of logics are susceptible to a strengthened version of Curry’s paradox. This can be adapted to provide a proof theoretic analysis of the ω-inconsistency in Lukasiewicz’s continuum valued logic, allowing us to better evaluate which logics are suitable for a näıve truth theory. On this basis I identify two natural subsystems of Lukasiewicz logic which individually, but not jointly, lack the problematic feature.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Non-Classical Approaches to the Brandenburger-Keisler Paradox

In this paper, we consider a well-known epistemic game theoretical paradox, called the Brandenburger-Keisler Paradox, and provide various alternative models in which the paradoxical statement becomes satisfiable. For this task, first, we resort to various non-classical logical frameworks, and reformulate the paradoxical statement in them. We discuss the paradox in non-well-founded set theory an...

متن کامل

Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: A Reference Approach

For any probability model M ≡ {p(x |θ,ω),θ ∈ Θ,ω ∈ Ω} assumed to describe the probabilistic behaviour of data x ∈ X, it is argued that testing whether or not the available data are compatible with the hypothesis H0 ≡ {θ = θ0} is best considered as a formal decision problem on whether to use (a0), or not to use (a1), the simpler probability model (or null model) M0 ≡ {p(x |θ0,ω),ω ∈ Ω}, where th...

متن کامل

lambda-Terms, Logic, Determiners and Quantifiers

In this paper, a theory T H based on combining type freeness with logic is introduced and is then used to build a theory of properties which is applied to determiners and quantiiers. It is well known that mixing type freeness and logic leads to contradictions. For example, by taking the following syntax of terms: t := xjx:tjt 1 t 2 j:t and applying the term x::xx to itself one gets a contradict...

متن کامل

Itiswellknownthatmixingtypefreenessandlogicleadstocontradictions.Forexample,by takingthefollowingsyntaxofterms: THETHEORYTH

In this paper, a theory T H based on combining type freeness with logic is introduced and is then used to build a theory of properties which is applied to determiners and quantiiers. It is well known that mixing type freeness and logic leads to contradictions. For example, by taking the following syntax of terms: t := xjx:tjt 1 t 2 j:t and applying the term x::xx to itself one gets a contradict...

متن کامل

Logic of the Preface Paradox

The preface paradox is the apparent pragmatic inconsistency that occurs when the author of a book declares in its preface that despite believing that it is highly probable that everything the book maintains is true it is also highly probable that the book contains at least some errors. The preface paradox has often been presented as an example of a logically inconsistent belief that it is never...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Studia Logica

دوره 101  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013